| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: keyword list/ecpg |
| Date: | 2008-05-27 08:03:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20080527080347.GA30368@feivel.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:15:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Does anyone object to moving the symbol definition part to a file of its
> > own that's inluded by both parser? Or does anyone have a better idea?
>
> AFAIK bison doesn't have an "include" capability, so I'm not sure how
> you plan to make that work?
You found the weak part in my idea. :-)
How about a small perl script that is run before bison and creates the
real grammar file?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-05-27 08:23:28 | Re: keyword list/ecpg |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2008-05-27 07:40:41 | Re: WITH RECURSIVE patches V0.1 TODO items |