Re: Postgresql MVCC, Read Committed Isolation Level and taking "snapshot"

From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql MVCC, Read Committed Isolation Level and taking "snapshot"
Date: 2008-05-18 12:04:56
Message-ID: 20080518140456.0bd8a209@dawn.webthatworks.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 16 May 2008 09:55:56 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:06:11AM +0200, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> wrote:
> > Is
> > BEGIN TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
> > what I'm looking for?

> Yes.

Perfect, thanks.

What is the effect of having nested functions all declared
SERIALIZABLE?

What if just the outermost is declared SERIALIZABLE?

--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message iSteve 2008-05-18 14:07:19 Re: tsearch2 on-demand dictionary loading & using functions in tsearch2
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2008-05-18 11:25:17 Re: tsearch2 on-demand dictionary loading & using functions in tsearch2