From: | Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Ottavio Campana <ottavio(at)campana(dot)vi(dot)it>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: problem with serial data type and access |
Date: | 2008-05-16 01:16:21 |
Message-ID: | 200805151816.21479.aklaver@comcast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 15 May 2008 9:14 am, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> Scott Marlowe ha scritto:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Ottavio Campana <ottavio(at)campana(dot)vi(dot)it>
wrote:
> >> I know it's not fully IT with the list, but maybe somebody can help me.
> >>
> >> I'm dealing with this scenario: access 97 is connected through odbc to a
> >> postgresql server. All tables are saved in postgresql and access is used
> >> only to generated the program interface.
> >>
> >> Everything works fines, but I'm having problems with the serial data
> >> type. I know a serial is an integer having as default the next value of
> >> a sequence. Since it is an integer, access does not recognize it as an
> >> autoincrement value, and it asks for is value.
> >>
> >> Did anyone of you already have this problem?
> >
> > Can you feed it a value of DEFAULT???
>
> I'd like to, but I don't think I could do it.
>
> The fact is that the serial data type is in pratice an integer, and when
> I also try to connect with pgadminIII I see an integer data type and not
> a serial. I think that since it sees an integer, it does not understand
> that it is a serial, and access does not recognize it as autoincrement.
>
> I'm stuck at this point...
Did you mark this field as the primary key when you linked the table?
--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vitaliyi | 2008-05-16 01:57:49 | SSL auth problem |
Previous Message | D. Dante Lorenso | 2008-05-16 00:46:26 | Re: PostgreSQL executing my function too many times during query |