From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres User <postgres(dot)developer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL? |
Date: | 2008-05-11 18:43:25 |
Message-ID: | 20080511184325.GA30844@depesz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Postgres User wrote:
> Unfortunately I didn't see a way to tell pg_dump to dump only objects
> of a specific type, like functions or sequences. It requires
> additional coding to parse the output and that's less than ideal...
hmmm .. "additional coding" seems a bit too much for a simple thing like
this:
pg_dump -s | perl -ne 'print if /^CREATE FUNCTION test_it/../^\s+LANGUAGE/'
of course it would be cool to have switch to do it, but hey - it hardly
even qualifies as one-liner. it's more "an expression" than code.
depesz
--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Postgres User | 2008-05-11 19:08:36 | Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL? |
Previous Message | Chuck Bai | 2008-05-11 18:43:23 | How to create a function with multiple RefCursor OUT parameters |