From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Wang <ruc_wang(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function |
Date: | 2008-05-07 22:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 200805080022.04016.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have developed the attached patch which fixes 0 ^ 123.3.
>
> Did you actually read the wikipedia entry you cited?
Considering that 0::float8 ^ 0::float8 yields 1, making the numeric operator
do the same might not be completely unreasonable, but I find the rationale
that it is better for discrete mathematics fairly ludicrous on multiple
levels.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 22:22:05 | Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-05-07 22:04:49 | Auto-updated fields |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 22:22:05 | Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-05-07 22:07:07 | Re: [GENERAL] pgbench not setting scale size correctly? |