From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] psql \pset pager |
Date: | 2008-05-06 21:34:49 |
Message-ID: | 200805062134.m46LYng10880@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > So, I think the answer is that we have the current behavior because of
> > backward compatibility. Perhaps we should be more strict in
> > ParseVariableBool(), perhaps only allowing true/false and on/off.
>
> If we're going to change it, we should make it match GUC's parse_bool,
> which has had some actual thought put into it.
Good idea. Do I copy the C code into /psql or somehow share the
function?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Vinogradovs | 2008-05-06 21:46:40 | Re: xlogdump & pgview |
Previous Message | Alex Vinogradovs | 2008-05-06 21:20:54 | xlogdump & pgview |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-06 21:44:44 | Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-06 21:33:13 | Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-06 21:44:44 | Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-06 21:26:34 | Re: Snapshot management, final |