From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ |
Date: | 2008-05-02 16:28:59 |
Message-ID: | 20080502092859.6a65a409@jd-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2 May 2008 09:12:32 -0700
"Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I still believe it makes sense to have them separated. I did have
> some data, which has since been destroyed, that suggested there were
> some system characterization differences for OLTP workloads with
> PostgreSQL. Let's hope those disks get delivered to Portland soon. :)
I have those disks.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-02 17:35:27 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-05-02 16:28:48 | Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ |