From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | George Gensure <werkt0(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch |
Date: | 2008-04-30 12:16:11 |
Message-ID: | 20080430121610.GA5622@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
George Gensure escribió:
> I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the
> administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but
> didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the
> read side.
I'd say too much -- postmaster runs with signals blocked all the time
(except during select()) so this is not necessary there.
Regarding the locking on backends, I admit I am not sure if this is
really a problem enough that you need a spinlock for it. Anyway we tend
not to use spinlocks too much -- probably an LWLock would be more
apropos, if a lock is really needed. (A bigger question is whether the
reload time should be local for each backend, or exposed globally
through MyProc. I don't think it's interesting enough to warrant that,
but perhaps others think differently.)
Lastly, I didn't read the patch close enough to tell if it would work on
both the EXEC_BACKEND case and the regular one.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-30 12:39:01 | Re: Documentation: ALTER ROLE - no password |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-04-30 11:49:44 | Re: Patch to add a feature to pg_standby |