From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication Syatem |
Date: | 2008-04-28 16:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 20080428162243.GN2970@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:35:37PM +0530, Gauri Kanekar wrote:
> Peter,
>
> We are doing vacuum full every alternate day. We also do vacuum analyze very
> often.
VACUUM FULL is making your problem worse, not better. Don't do that.
> We are currently using 8.1.3 version.
You need immediately to upgrade to the latest 8.1 stability and
security release, which is 8.1.11. This is a drop-in replacement.
It's an urgent fix for your case.
> Auto vacuum is already on. But the table1 is so busy that auto vacuum don't
> get sufficient chance to vacuum it :(.
You probably need to tune autovacuum not to do that table, and just
vacuum that table in a constant loop or something. VACUUM should
_never_ "take the site down". If it does, you're doing it wrong.
> Have already tried all the option listed by you, thats y we reached to the
> decision of having a replication sytsem. So any suggestion on that :).
I think you will find that no replication system will solve your
underlying problems. That said, I happen to work for a company that
will sell you a replication system to work with 8.1 if you really want
it.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-04-28 16:23:45 | Re: Replication Syatem |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2008-04-28 16:19:48 | shared_buffer/DRBD performances |