From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | chester c young <chestercyoung(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sql pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql: no schema info |
Date: | 2008-04-28 00:05:41 |
Message-ID: | 20080428000541.GC9074@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
chester c young wrote:
> # create table new_schema.table1(
> # col1 integer default nextval( 'seq1' )
> # );
>
> using old_schema.seq1, not new_schema.seq1
Yes, that's correct -- assuming you had an old_schema.seq1 sequence too.
> and imho to make matters more difficult to troubleshoot:
>
> # \dt table1 -> does not show which schema for seq1
I agree it can be confusing if you're not looking for it.
alvherre=# set search_path to old_s;
SET
alvherre=# \d new_s.table1
Tabla «new_s.table1»
Columna | Tipo | Modificadores
---------+---------+-----------------------------------
col1 | integer | default nextval('seq1'::regclass)
Here, the nextval() is correctly _not_ qualified, because the current
search path is the sequence's schema. But it is certainly confusing.
You have to set the search_path to the table's search path for the
problem to be obvious:
alvherre=# set search_path to new_s;
SET
alvherre=# \d new_s.table1
Tabla «new_s.table1»
Columna | Tipo | Modificadores
---------+---------+-----------------------------------------
col1 | integer | default nextval('old_s.seq1'::regclass)
alvherre=# \d table1
Tabla «new_s.table1»
Columna | Tipo | Modificadores
---------+---------+-----------------------------------------
col1 | integer | default nextval('old_s.seq1'::regclass)
I'm not sure what's a good solution here. Perhaps the \d command should
temporarily set the schema to something that would cause regclass to
display qualified names all the time, when you passed it a qualified
name (using SET LOCAL perhaps, but reverting to the original value after
then \d is done). You can't just use a nonexistant schema or some kind
of NULL or empty value, because SET rejects it. I can set it to $user,
which is accepted but doesn't exist on my scratch database:
alvherre=# set search_path to '$user';
SET
alvherre=# \d new_s.table1
Tabla «new_s.table1»
Columna | Tipo | Modificadores
---------+---------+-----------------------------------------
col1 | integer | default nextval('old_s.seq1'::regclass)
Another option would be to set it to the given schema, so that any name
not on that schema is qualified.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-04-28 07:30:09 | Re: psql: no schema info |
Previous Message | chester c young | 2008-04-27 23:33:26 | Re: psql: no schema info |