Re: MERGE Specification

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MERGE Specification
Date: 2008-04-22 01:57:20
Message-ID: 20080422015720.GF16040@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:

> Unrelated to rule processing, you did read the bit about MERGE and race
> conditions? ISTM that MERGE as it stands isn't very useful for anything
> other than large data loads since its going to cause problems if used
> concurrently.

But that's how the committee designed it, yes?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 王佳伟 2008-04-22 02:23:22 Can't start psql
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-04-22 01:28:30 Re: MERGE Specification