| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |
| Date: | 2008-04-21 14:00:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20080421160059.75d1ec21@mha-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> > I remain very unconvinced that making it that much more complex is
> > worth it.. But if someone sets up a complete system to test it,
> > sure - since I don't write *or* read any of the translated FAQs we
> > should obviously listen more to those who do.
>
> Isn't this what we do with the docs now?
More or less. In my view, a FAQ is a much more dynamic document.
And we've certainly had our share of people not working on the docs
because it's too hard. (I know I used to have to submit all docs
patches untested because it took me a year or so to get the build
process working on win32. Now I've given that up and have a linux VM to
build the docs in, but you get the idea..)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-04-21 14:02:07 | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-21 13:59:08 | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |