| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |
| Date: | 2008-04-21 12:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200804211433.51065.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Samstag, 19. April 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> The FAQs are another matter however. I suggested some time back moving
> those to DocBook XML.
The question is whether we consider the FAQ to be a document tied to a
PostgreSQL release (e.g., there is a separate FAQ applying to each release)
or whether it is a "global" document. In the former case, it should be in
CVS, in the latter it should be somewhere else. In my mind, it is quite
clear that it is the latter.
But while I am in favor of moving as much as possible of the developer
documentation to the wiki, I am not sure such a primary, user-facing document
should be in a wiki. Not because I am afraid of anyone being able to edit
it, but I am concerned about the impression this creates with (new) users.
Could we mirror it from the wiki to the "real" web site?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-04-21 12:40:48 | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-04-21 12:25:31 | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB |