From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |
Date: | 2008-04-20 17:16:55 |
Message-ID: | 20080420191655.41a18876@mha-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> The FAQs are another matter however. I suggested some time back
> >> moving those to DocBook XML. A friend was working on a script to
> >> do the initial conversion automatically. The nice thing about it
> >> is that we can then use the xml2po tools to create PO files for
> >> translation. This means that translations are more easily kept up
> >> to date. Are you open to this possibility?
> >
> > What would be the advantage of keeping it in DocBook over the wiki?
> > One of the main advantages of keeping it on the wiki would be to
> > allow others to help out with the editing of them.
>
> Two words:
>
> print format
>
> If we want to push the FAQ to the wiki, we should write a stylesheet
> that transforms the docbook to wiki output (wouldn't be surprised if
> such a beast already exists) but the source should be Docbook or ODF.
You're not actually claiming we have print format today, are you?
And have you actually *tried* printing something from the wiki? Doesn't
look so bad to me.
And do people really *print* something like a FAQ?
Anyway. If people want to build a more complex system to deal with the
user FAQs, be my guest. The developer FAQ is obviously a very different
thing from those.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-04-20 17:20:29 | Re: WAL files format |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-04-20 17:13:54 | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |