Re: log_filename()

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log_filename()
Date: 2008-04-21 01:38:27
Message-ID: 20080420183827.07f6ff86@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:32:53 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > We got the comment on the docs:
> > log_filename(string) is misleading, since it really doesn't use a
> > strftime pattern, but instead a reimplementation of strftime, in
> > order to be cross-platform.
>
> AFAIK that implementation covers everything that's in the POSIX
> spec... was this person whining because he tried to use some
> nonstandard extension?

That is verbatim what was stated, *shrug*.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-21 03:29:48 Re: INSERT ... SELECT ... FOR SHARED?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-21 01:32:53 Re: log_filename()