From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Scott Ribe" <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>, "Alan Hodgson" <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) |
Date: | 2008-04-20 18:48:16 |
Message-ID: | 20080420114816.42f779ab@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:32:58 -0600
"Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Exactly. There are several things you can do on the replica that you
> wouldn't do on the master for better performance. Really big numbers
> of WAL segments, no background writer, fsync off as mentioned, WAL on
> a RAID-0 with 10 disks, no battery back on a caching RAID controller,
> and so on.
You are still limited by how fast you can pull data from the master
over the network to the slave. Which when dealing with 500GB+ is a
significant limitation.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-04-20 18:55:02 | Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-04-20 17:32:58 | Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-04-20 18:55:02 | Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2008-04-20 17:49:50 | Re: Changed Hosts, Lots of Errors in PostgreSQL - Help Please! |