| From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
|---|---|
| To: | Colin Wetherbee <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion for psql command interpretation |
| Date: | 2008-04-16 18:01:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200804161806.m3GI6QEj097931@smtp5.jaring.my |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 04:46 AM 4/16/2008, Colin Wetherbee wrote:
>Tom Lane wrote:
>>Colin Wetherbee <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org> writes:
>>>I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to
>>>happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".
>>Well, it's more of a historical hangover. Personally I'd not have
>>much problem with breaking backward compatibility on this point.
>
>I'm not generally in the habit of making typos, so this doesn't
>affect me too much.
>
>However, IMHO and as I mentioned previously, I don't think
>"\timimng" should succeed. I'll leave the rest of the discussion up
>to you and the other developers, though. :)
I too agree that \timimng should not work.
Maybe someone can think of an undesirable surprise that springs from
this "feature" ;).
\i
\e
Are possible candidates (probably others could clobber files given a typo).
I think requiring a space between command and arguments would be a
good idea. And not doing stuff if there are syntax errors...
Link.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-04-16 18:48:17 | Re: table as log (multiple writers and readers) |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2008-04-16 17:59:12 | Re: generate_series woes |