Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Jimmy Choi <yhjchoi(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"
Date: 2008-04-16 16:06:19
Message-ID: 20080416160619.GB5288@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Craig Ringer escribió:

> It's not stated explicitly, but I'm pretty sure discussion here has
> mentioned that too. Given that, VACUUM FULL on a just-CLUSTERed table
> should be redundant.

It is, and a REINDEX is redundant too because CLUSTER does it
internally.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message brian 2008-04-16 16:11:39 Re: table as log (multiple writers and readers)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2008-04-16 16:01:26 Re: "vacuum" and "cluster"