Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_terminate_backend() to allow terminating only a single

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_terminate_backend() to allow terminating only a single
Date: 2008-04-15 17:38:41
Message-ID: 200804151738.m3FHcfx25866@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I wonder if it's OK to grab an LWLock in a signal handler.
>
> > I am not in a signal handler there --- pg_terminate_backend() happens
> > for the person requesting the termination, not the terminated backend
> > that gets the signal.
>
> A more interesting question is what makes you think that taking
> ProcArrayLock here has any value whatsoever.

I took the lock so I would be sure the PGPROC array was the matching pid
and not some other pid that was created between my check and the setting
of the variable.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-15 18:22:31 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_terminate_backend() to allow terminating only a single
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-15 17:32:09 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_terminate_backend() to allow terminating only a single

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2008-04-15 17:42:59 Re: pulling libpqtypes from queue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-15 17:32:09 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_terminate_backend() to allow terminating only a single