Re: Lessons from commit fest

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lessons from commit fest
Date: 2008-04-14 20:04:11
Message-ID: 200804142004.m3EK4BE04349@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We should probably try to limit the focus of fests to consider only
> >> actual patches, with design discussions handled "live" during normal
> >> development, the way they've always been in the past.
>
> > We have discouraged design discussions during feature freeze and beta ---
> > do we want to change that?
>
> No, changing that wasn't what I meant to suggest. My point here is that
> we'd dropped a number of big mushy discussions into the queue with the
> idea that they'd be re-opened during commit fest, but new discussion
> did not happen to any useful extent. Conclusion: don't bother putting
> anything less concrete than a patch on the fest queue.

So when/how do those discussions get resolved?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-14 20:12:59 Re: Lessons from commit fest
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-14 19:52:06 Re: Lessons from commit fest