From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Date: | 2008-04-14 19:42:39 |
Message-ID: | 20080414194239.GR4541@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > the fest, and I think it's unlikely to happen in future either.
> > We should probably try to limit the focus of fests to consider only
> > actual patches, with design discussions handled "live" during normal
> > development, the way they've always been in the past.
>
> We have discouraged design discussions during feature freeze and beta ---
> do we want to change that?
In fact, discussions were discouraged during the March commitfest too.
Perhaps this is a good idea -- discussions on new development should
be deferred until the end of the commitfest, if one is in progress.
We'll see what happens on the May commitfest, but my guess is that it
will be a lot shorter than the March one. If it takes 1.5-2 weeks, it's
not so bad, and it means people is eager to get the current patches done
as quickly as possible so that discussions on items they are interested
in can continue.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-14 19:44:42 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-14 19:41:39 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |