From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Date: | 2008-04-14 17:27:53 |
Message-ID: | 20080414172753.GO4541@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Brendan Jurd escribió:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > As far as the Wiki page is concerned, it would be good to make sure the
> > entries have a bit more info than just a header line -- things such as
> > "author", who reviewed and what did the reviewer say about it.
>
> In a wiki context, this sort of thing has got "Template" written all
> over it. I've done a little editing on Wikipedia, so I've got some
> idea about how to make wiki Templates work. I'm not claiming to be an
> expert, but if nobody else has a particular yen for it, I can have a
> go at setting up some simple templates to make it easier to add a
> "patch" or a "review" in a structured way.
Please have a go at it in a test page. The main principle we need is
that the thing must be as easy as possible to edit. (FWIW if you can
come up with a better markup than what we currently use, we'd welcome
the advise.)
> > Lastly, I would say that pushing submitters to enter their sent patches
> > into the Wiki worked -- we need to ensure that they keep doing it.
>
> +1. Although I wouldn't say that there has yet been a "push" for
> submitters to enter their patches into the wiki =)
Well, I pushed some authors via private email. Others did not seem to
need any pushing :-)
> I've started adding my own patches to the wiki recently. The only
> thing about the process that sucks is that I need a URL linking to the
> message in the archives. I naturally want to add my patch to the wiki
> immediately after sending my email to -patches, and it takes some
> material interval of time for messages to show up on the archive. My
> solution was to just pull the message ID out of the headers in gmail
> and fudge the URL.
Right, that's the way I use them too. Sorry we don't have anything
better :-( The archives are refreshed every 10 minutes, so it's not
like you need to wait for a week, either.
Of course, I've configured my email client so that Message-Ids are shown
all over the place, so I don't have to mess around clicking stuff.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-14 17:27:55 | Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-04-14 17:20:38 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |