From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
Date: | 2008-04-10 14:26:20 |
Message-ID: | 200804101626.21246.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Another is that the email list provides a
> "push" mechanism for putting the proposed patch under the noses of a
> bunch of people, a few of whom will hopefully take a sniff ;-).
> A tracker is very much more of a "pull" scenario where someone has to
> actively go looking for pending/proposed changes.
In my mind the pull mechanism is exactly one of the major features I would
expect from a proper tracking system, so I can "pull" and work on the issues
that affect me at a time when it is convenient for me, instead of at the time
when the "push" happens.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-10 14:28:55 | Re: Commit fest queue |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-10 14:23:51 | Re: Commit fest queue |