From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue] |
Date: | 2008-04-10 15:46:41 |
Message-ID: | 200804101546.m3AFkf518624@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> > Lastly, how is this sustainable? I don't see anything that is reducing
> > Bruce's workload. (for example)
>
> The only think that will ever reduce Bruce's workload is him trusting
> that things aren't getting overlooked. The value to the work Bruce does
> is that he really doesn't let anything slip through the cracks. One way
> we can do that is by having a tracker/wiki which is an easy place for
> Bruce to see that:
> "Hey, this is/was looked after. I don't have to worry about this
> <thing>, I can delete it (and the followups to it) from my huge list
> of even more things to look at without expending lots of time
> re-reading the whole thread to make sure it didn't just die out"
Yes, the sooner someone applies or rejects a patch or idea the quicker I
can remove it from my watch list and the fewer items I have to watch.
Also, let me add the wiki does not have items that need
discussion/feedback for this commit-fest. Is that going to be added
someday?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-10 15:47:16 | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-10 15:41:51 | Re: Commit fest queue |