From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
Date: | 2008-04-10 14:10:20 |
Message-ID: | 20080410071020.767f6033@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:36:23 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> > Bug/request trackers are great tools, but they're just tools. They
> > don't replace actually having to do the work. Given the really
> > trivial number of patches we're dealing with really just adding
> > entries to a wiki page is a perfectly reasonable solution.
I don't think so because it really isn't a change from what we have
now. There isn't much difference from having a wiki page versus just
having conversations on the patch list and moving email around.
We really need to be looking at the bigger picture here. The more
ridiculous our patch management and feedback procedures are, the more
likely we won't get patches from new people (there are a whole of other
reasons too, but for this context).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-04-10 14:12:56 | Re: MSVC build broken with perl 5.10 |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2008-04-10 14:10:03 | Re: Commit fest queue |