| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-09 14:33:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200804091433.m39EXh024033@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > This isn't really about tools. It's about who wants to put in the
> > day-after-day, year-after-year drudge work to maintain the queue.
> > Whoever wants to do the work can pick their tools...
>
> I still think it would be best if the patch authors did the work. They
> are the ones who care about the patch and want the review, and they're
> in the best position to know what the status of a patch is. Others can
> do it as well of course, in the spirit of a Wiki.
Does that move us in the direction of the patch tracker? That does
raise the bar for patch submitters, though I would catch any patches
that weren't in the tracker.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David BOURIAUD | 2008-04-09 14:35:38 | psql \du and \dg commands. |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2008-04-09 14:30:18 | Re: Concurrent psql API |