From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: File system snapshots for multiple file systems |
Date: | 2008-04-08 07:39:19 |
Message-ID: | 20080408073919.GB7313@www.trapp.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Incidentally, I looked at this stuff just a couple of days ago, and it
[...]
> Or checkpoint, yes? I don't see tar backing up large (100+GB)
> databases in < 5 minutes.
Checkpoinitng is definitely coolest. If your file system doesn't do
that, rsync is a good poor man's replacement:
first rsync (takes long)
(or work from an older backup)
pg_start_backup(...)
rsync (should be much faster)
rsync WAL
pg_stop_backup()
I regularly rsync moderately active 500GB filesystems on fairly feeble
hardware in about 5-10 minutes (for daily backups).
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH+yEnBcgs9XrR2kYRAg00AJ4+RXKN9apDd1y6EcP+fkJbIRL0uwCfRcD/
KEDesKvCvSA4CzhomRJJ9Zg=
=Nw8x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-04-08 07:43:06 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Implement a few changes to how shared libraries and dynamically |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-04-08 07:36:14 | Re: File system snapshots for multiple file systems |