From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze status |
Date: | 2008-04-08 03:36:25 |
Message-ID: | 20080407203625.4173c649@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Better tools would be good, but unless someone commits to producing
> > a tool that will be ready by June but not by May, that's not a good
> > reason to slide either.
>
> Fine with me --- I just wanted to give Tom a break.
>
We could just ban him from reviewing for a fest :P.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-08 04:37:13 | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Implement a few changes to how shared libraries and dynamically |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-08 03:33:35 | Re: pgsql: Implement a few changes to how shared libraries and dynamically |