Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>> I think the agreement was that dblink_current_query was to be
> >>> implemented on top of this. In fact I don't see any reason not to.
> >>
> >> Really? It seemed like just duplicate functionality.
>
> > It's called "backwards compatibility". The nice thing about it is that
> > it doesn't cost us any extra code.
>
> Indeed. It's just silly to break dblink users when there's no need.

OK. Did someone mention this before because I don't remember it and the
patch removed the dblink usage. Do we continue to document the
function?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +