From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing |
Date: | 2008-04-04 19:05:05 |
Message-ID: | 200804041905.m34J55t13168@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing query.
> > At the same time remove dblink/dblink_current_query() as it is no longer
> > necessary
> > *BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY ISSUE* for dblink
>
> I think the agreement was that dblink_current_query was to be
> implemented on top of this. In fact I don't see any reason not to.
Really? It seemed like just duplicate functionality.
> Also, wasn't the name supposed to be client_query?
Because pg_stat_activity already has current_query (and no one has
complained about it) there was discussion to just make it current_query.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-04 19:11:06 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-04 18:45:36 | pgsql: Re-implement division for numeric values using the traditional |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-04 19:11:06 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing |
Previous Message | Panagiotis Papadakos | 2008-04-04 19:01:38 | sp-gist for postgresql-8.3 |