Re: Databasing sponsors

On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:12:42 -0400
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:

> > > I'd like to expand this system to cover doing the full sponsor
> > > breakdown we discussed and approved 1.5 years ago but never
> > > implemented. So as long as I can stuff giving categories into
> >
> > Let's not get ahead of ourselves. It was discussed, it was never
> > approved and as you are fully aware I had reservations about it.
> > Further later in conversations we discussed a different scenario.
> > However, this is a technical discussion and we can get into those
> > details later.
> >
>
> It's not clear to me that you haven't already opened this up by
> adding the stype field. I don't see anything on the current sponsors
> page that indicates what type of sponsor people are, so you've made a
> subtle but substantive change to the system defining the schema as
> you did.
>

Categorization is going to happen. The question is how, which is not a
question for this thread.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate