| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Consistent \d commands in psql |
| Date: | 2008-03-31 21:36:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20080331213629.GD24048@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, should we remove the special hack that discriminates against
> showing I/O functions (or really anything that touches cstring) in \df?
> ISTM that was mostly there to reduce clutter, and this proposal solves
> that problem more neatly. I know I've cursed that behavior under my
> breath more than once, but again maybe my usage isn't typical.
+1
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-31 21:51:09 | Re: Consistent \d commands in psql |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-31 20:23:32 | Re: POSIX shared memory support |