From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Cast as compound type |
Date: | 2008-03-30 18:15:13 |
Message-ID: | 20080330181513.GA12289@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Folks,
I'd like to take a whack at making set-returning functions returning
SETOF RECORD a little more fun to use. Let's imagine that we have a
table foo and a function returning SETOF RECORD that can return foos.
The call might look something like:
SELECT a, b, c
FROM f(ROW OF foo)
WHERE ...;
This would make it much easier and less error-prone to use SETOF
RECORD.
Would others like to see such a feature?
If so, what pieces of the code would I be touching for the first
patch?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sanjay sharma | 2008-03-30 18:52:47 | Submission of Feature Request : RFC- for Implementing Transparent Data Encryption in Postgres |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-30 18:11:16 | Re: [PATCH] Add size/acl information when listing databases |