| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Another summerofcode.html update |
| Date: | 2008-03-27 09:15:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20080327101555.790f29c6@mha-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:53, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000
> >
> > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying
> > > > so... in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we
> > > > apply. Thank you for your support.
> > >
> > > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is
> > > for?
> >
> > Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received
> > notification today. Robert are you not on
> > pgweb(at)pgweb(dot)postgresql(dot)org?
> >
> sure, but those messages are not threaded to original requests, and
> i'd suspect not everyone who submits a patch is subscribed there.
I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note appear
in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out which things
can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that needs to be
applied.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-27 10:43:24 | Re: Patch to make some strings available to translations |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-27 03:07:16 | Re: Another summerofcode.html update |