From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale? |
Date: | 2008-03-26 15:25:18 |
Message-ID: | 20080326152518.GI27264@a-kretschmer.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
am Wed, dem 26.03.2008, um 16:15:20 +0100 mailte Marinos Yannikos folgendes:
> A. Kretschmer schrieb:
> >>create index foo1 on bla (a);
> >>create index foo2 on bla (b);
> >>create index foo3 on bla (a,b);
> >>[...]
> >
> >Which version do you have? Since 8.1 pg can use a so called 'bitmap
> >index scan', because of this feature i guess you don't need the index
> >foo3. (if you have 8.1 or higher)
>
> 8.3.1 - foo3 is being used though in presence of both foo1 and foo2, so
> I'd suppose that it's a better choice even with bitmap index scan
> available...
Maybe...
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-03-26 15:27:24 | Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale? |
Previous Message | Matthew | 2008-03-26 15:16:55 | Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale? |