| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 13:53:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20080326135351.GB5372@crankycanuck.ca |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:03:34AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> against. People who are using the current warm-standby code are already
> grappling with issues like how to coordinate master/slave failover
> (including my second favorite acronym, STONITH for "shoot the other node
> in the head"). I don't expect handling that sort of thing will ever be
> integrated into the PostgreSQL database core.
Note that most other database products don't integrate it in their core
either. They package separate tools for it, and sell it as a single system,
but you can often buy the separate tools independently. Oracle's RAC is an
exception, but it also works completely differently than any of this.
A
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin | 2008-03-26 14:08:37 | Re: Make MS Access "UPDATE" PostGre SQL Table |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-26 13:21:17 | Re: Reindex does not finish 8.2.6 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-26 13:54:46 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-26 13:48:40 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |