From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications |
Date: | 2008-03-25 16:52:01 |
Message-ID: | 200803251652.m2PGq1r11825@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> >> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
> >> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
> >> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
> >> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
> > idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It
> looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the
> people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with
> little friction.
Yea, I think we are still learning, and polishing our tools.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dragan Zubac | 2008-03-25 16:57:11 | Re: GiST opclass and varlena |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-25 16:49:25 | Re: partial dump of patch queue to wiki |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-25 17:28:04 | Re: partial dump of patch queue to wiki |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-25 16:49:25 | Re: partial dump of patch queue to wiki |