From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: xlogdump |
Date: | 2008-03-25 00:42:45 |
Message-ID: | 200803250042.m2P0gjC14714@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO:
* Move pgfoundry's xlogdump to /contrib and have it rely more closely
on the WAL backend code
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00035.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> There's an xlogdump project on pgfoundry. However it suffers from perennial
> bitrot as it has to maintain its own table of xlog record types and code to
> decode each xlog record type.
>
> Earlier I modified xlogdump to generate a CSV loadable data set so I could do
> some basic analysis and see what types of operations are generating the most
> wal traffic. But I found it had bitrotted and needed some attention to bring
> it up to date.
>
> Again now I wanted to repeat that analysis to measure the effect HOT has had
> on WAL traffic. And again now I find it has bitrotted, not least because of
> HOT of course...
>
> I think this module should be rewritten to depend more closely on the Postgres
> source files. What I'm doing now is making an SRF in the style of the
> pageinspect module which will read an arbitrary wal file and generate records
> directly.
>
> This has a big disadvantage compared to the original approach, namely that you
> need a functioning Postgres instance of the same version to dissect wal
> records.
>
> But it also has a big advantage, namely that it will always be in sync. It
> will just use the same RmgrTable to find the rm_name and call the rm_desc
> method to decode the record. The result might not be quite as or dense as the
> rm_desc function is meant for debugging messages. We could address that
> sometime with a new method if we wanted to.
>
> I'm thinking of actually dropping it directly into the pageinspect contrib
> module. It's not quite an exact fit but it doesn't seem to deserve it's own
> contrib module and it's likely to suffer the same bitrot problem if it lives
> in pgfoundry.
>
> Incidentally I would like to call xlog.c:RecordIsValid() which is currently a
> static function. Any objection to exporting it? It doesn't depend on any
> external xlog.c state.
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-25 01:19:25 | Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications |
Previous Message | Stephen Denne | 2008-03-25 00:42:17 | Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas |