From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Idea for minor tstore optimization |
Date: | 2008-03-22 23:47:12 |
Message-ID: | 200803222347.m2MNlDE17039@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO:
* Avoid tuple some tuple copying in sort routines
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg01206.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > I notice that several of the call sites of tuplestore_puttuple() start
> > with arrays of datums and nulls, call heap_form_tuple(), and then switch
> > into the tstore's context and call tuplestore_puttuple(), which
> > deep-copies the HeapTuple into the tstore. ISTM it would be faster and
> > simpler to provide a tuplestore_putvalues(), which just takes the datum
> > + nulls arrays and avoids the additional copy.
>
> Seems reasonable. Check whether tuplesort should offer the same, while
> you are at it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-23 00:05:16 | Re: Reworking WAL locking |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-22 22:32:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Function structure in formatting.c |