From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: partitioning using dblink |
Date: | 2008-03-22 22:05:54 |
Message-ID: | 200803222205.m2MM5sV06603@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Added to TODO:
o Add checks to prevent a CREATE RULE views on inherited tables
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-02/msg01420.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> writes:
> > I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any
> > errors,
>
> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a
> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-22 23:55:17 | Re: Postgresql partitioning |
Previous Message | Douglas McNaught | 2008-03-22 21:25:34 | Re: Postgres connection error |