Re: Proposal: new large object API

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new large object API
Date: 2008-03-21 14:38:29
Message-ID: 20080321.233829.89140968.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > What is evil with a polymorphic function?
>
> (1) It's creating a false match --- your proposed entry in the opr_sanity
> results has nothing at all to do with what the test is looking for.
>
> (2) Refactoring to have two separate C functions will make the code
> clearer, and not noticeably longer.

Ok, here is the revised patch.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 5.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-21 14:41:11 Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds]
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-21 14:06:06 Re: Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message NikhilS 2008-03-21 14:45:43 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-21 14:00:11 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1