From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | pgsql-committers list is misconfigured |
Date: | 2008-03-20 19:25:22 |
Message-ID: | 20080320192522.GF6235@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hi,
Again a message to pgsql-committers went unsent. Bruce committed
changes to several README files, and I didn't get the email and it's not
on the archives either:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-03/
(I guess it's somewhere on Maia's queue.) For example see rev 1.5 here:
http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/access/gin/README
Also, I sent an email with a fake @pgfoundry.org address this morning,
and it passed without requiring moderator approval. Also, I added a
X-No-Archive header to avoid having the test message appearing on the
archives, but to no effect -- the message is there all right:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-03/msg00393.php
I think the idea here is that any pgfoundry.org address passes through
unmolested to allow the pgfoundry projects to publish their changes to
pgsql-committers. I think this is a mistake, and others have vouched
against this idea too (most notably Peter Eisentraut.)
Finally, and what prompted this test message, was the fact that Heikki
committed a patch this morning and his message got stuck in the
moderation queue. I wonder how smart it is to be letting @pgfoundry.org
mails unchecked, but have @postgresql.org addresses filtered ... ??
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-20 19:40:16 | Re: Updated SummerofCode.html |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-03-20 19:13:33 | Re: Updated SummerofCode.html |