From: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | dynamically generated SQL and planner/performance |
Date: | 2008-03-20 15:43:55 |
Message-ID: | 20080320164355.32e9c997@webthatworks.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I've a lot of code that should call different functions according to
values in tables.
something like:
create table FuncName(Name varchar(10), arg int);
insert into FuncName values('ciro',5);
insert into FuncName values('pino',7);
insert into FuncName values('nano',11);
create or replace function ciro(arg int, out res int) as
$$
begin
res:=arg;
return;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
create or replace function pino(arg int, out res int) as
$$
begin
res:=arg*2;
return;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
create or replace function nano(arg int, out res int) as
$$
begin
res:=arg*4;
return;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
create or replace function FBuilder(out res int) as
$$
declare
statement varchar(256);
_Name varchar(10);
_arg int;
begin
select into _Name, _arg Name, arg from FuncName order by random();
statement := ' select * from ' || _Name || '(' || _arg || ')';
execute statement into res;
return;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
select * from FBuilder();
I don't understand which impact will have on the planner, caching
etc... generating the statement dynamically.
Will the execution of ciro, pino e nano be affected?
Or will just the plan for executing FBuilder statement be affected?
thanks
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Trutwin | 2008-03-20 16:02:21 | ALTER TABLE with USING clause for timestamp |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2008-03-20 15:17:37 | Re: unexpected results with NOT IN query |