Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-03-18 02:56:40
Message-ID: 200803171956.41110.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

KaiGai,

> A flexible framework is worthwhile for both operating systems.
> Please confirm it to the TS folks.

Yep, that's the idea. Glenn was fine with your stuff last year, I expect
it'll still be fine.

Other than SELinux and TrustedSolaris, does anyone know of other role-based or
multilevel security frameworks we should check against? I'd like to have any
security framework we approve be plug-in adaptable to everything out there.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-03-18 02:57:36 Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-18 02:50:27 Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-03-18 02:57:36 Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-18 02:50:27 Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches