From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch Status |
Date: | 2008-03-17 16:54:32 |
Message-ID: | 200803171654.m2HGsWi08401@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Well, this all seemed like work-in-progress stuff so it wasn't being
tracked. If you have things that need to be reviewed/applied, I suggest
you resubmit and mark them as ready.
As far as the doc patch, I see that as applied by Tom:
revision 2.113
date: 2008/01/23 20:21:37; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +10 -4
branches: 2.113.2;
Provide a concrete example of parameter expansion in archive_command.
Per discussion of bug #3877. Simon Riggs, some fixes by moi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've submitted 5 patches in Jan/Feb, none of which appear on the patch
> status page for the CommitFest, or any other status page I'm aware of.
> There *is* a comment on that page about "Minor Recovery..." which was a
> patch from me that was committed to 8.3 on 26 Sep 2007, so that item can
> be removed from the list.
>
> My understanding of status on them is this:
>
> * Bulk Insert tuning - 26 Feb
> Reviewed and changes agreed. With me to complete patch.
>
> * TransactionIdIsInProgress cache
> Committed on 11 Mar
>
> * Truncate Triggers - 30 Jan
> Not reviewed yet.
> This is a fully tested and production ready patch, apart from a few
> sections of #ifdef'd code that were intended as stubs to show how we
> might implement a brief suggestion of Tom's as an extension to the
> concept of Truncate Triggers. I think we can ignore that and look to
> apply the patch, minus the #ifdef'd sections now. Happy to produce a
> clean patch with no #ifdef'd sections if that assists review.
>
> * sinval contention reduction - 25 Jan
> A discussion patch prior to some performance testing which subsequently
> never took place. FWIW I have an updated patch which I haven't yet
> published but haven't yet had access to a test machine to try this at
> high volumes.
>
> * Doc patch for bug 3877 - 17 Jan
> Ready to be applied.
>
> My understanding is that all prior patches of mine have been dealt with.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
> PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-17 16:56:58 | Re: Minimum selectivity estimate for LIKE 'prefix%' |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-03-17 16:52:27 | Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |