Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-03-17 14:21:21
Message-ID: 20080317142121.GC4317@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>> Before we go any further, is this work derived from SELinux? If so, is
>> it covered under the GPL? If so, can it be licensed under BSD terms?
>
> All of SE-PostgreSQL works are licensed unser BSD terms.
> We are considering to push SE-PostgreSQL into upstreamed PostgreSQL from
> the beginning, and we understand to choose GPL makes it impossible.

Right. The question is: since this is derived from SE-Linux, is it
affected by SE-Linux license?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-17 14:41:33 Re: New style of hash join proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-17 14:11:39 Re: Rewriting Free Space Map

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-03-17 14:45:47 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-03-17 14:04:42 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches