From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | luca(dot)ciciriello(at)email(dot)it, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LOCK TABLE HELP |
Date: | 2008-03-14 15:39:41 |
Message-ID: | 20080314153941.GI4843@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> luca(dot)ciciriello(at)email(dot)it wrote:
> My action are:
>
> void *Execute(void *pParam)
> {
> ........................................
> ........................................
>
> & nbsp; string tableLock = "BEGIN WORK;";
> tableLock.append(" LOCK TABLE ");
> tableLock.append(actorTable);
> tableLock.append(" IN ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE;");
> res = PQexec(connection, tableLock.c_str());
> Well, all this doesn't work (the connection is th e always the same in
> all methods and functions). Have I to Lock the table, perform some
> operation on this table, and unlock the table all in the same function
> scope?
What do you mean it doesn't work? How exactly it fails?
If anything, I'd suggest to send the LOCK TABLE in a separate PQexec()
call from BEGIN WORK.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2008-03-14 15:39:55 | Re: postgre vs MySQL |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-03-14 15:37:47 | Re: LOCK TABLE HELP |