Re: pain of postgres upgrade with extensions

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pain of postgres upgrade with extensions
Date: 2008-03-12 19:45:19
Message-ID: 20080312194518.GB8934@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:34:03PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > - dump version N database
> > - create empty version N+1 database
> > - install N+1's version of each needed contrib module into new database
> > - restore dump, ignoring "object already exists" errors
> >
> > There is a TODO to figure out some cleaner way of handling this sort
> > of thing ...
>
> I think I smell a GSOC project....

The most promising way I remember was to create "packages" which wrap a
collection of types/tables/functions. The normal pg_depend structure
would track this and make sure that things didn't get deleted. On the
other side it would provide a way for pg_dump it identify the
components and not dump them.

The SQL standard has something called "modules" but I don't remember if
it was at all compatable.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-03-12 19:45:47 Re: PostgreSQL user documentation wiki open for business
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-03-12 19:34:03 Re: pain of postgres upgrade with extensions