From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: TODO-list on wiki (was: TODO update about SQLSTATE to PGconn) |
Date: | 2008-03-12 15:20:18 |
Message-ID: | 200803121520.m2CFKI919869@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Let's move the TODO list to the wiki.
>
> > We need it to do a few things:
>
> > o We need to be able to pull a text and HTML copies for tarballs
>
> Why? Even if we think the TODO list needs to appear in tarballs (which
> is hardly a given if you ask me), why the heck does it have to be in two
> formats? AFAIK the only reason we bother with an HTML version is to
> have something to put on the website, and this proposal supersedes that
> aspect of things. ISTM a plain-text copy would be plenty.
Fine with me.
> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
users a list of all known bugs/missing features in that major release.
The current web version very soon doesn't match the major release they
are running, and I am unsure we want to have historical links for every
major release.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-12 15:26:42 | Re: Re: TODO-list on wiki (was: TODO update about SQLSTATE to PGconn) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-12 15:18:18 | Re: Re: TODO-list on wiki (was: TODO update about SQLSTATE to PGconn) |