Re: Email not searchable in our archives

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Email not searchable in our archives
Date: 2008-03-11 22:20:12
Message-ID: 20080311152012.3bd779b9@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:02:25 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Perhaps I should just try without the subdir and see if it works.

I am wondering if we should bail out of Mhonarc all together. Do we
actually need it? We have the actual mbox files right? Couldn't we
build our own parser for whatever?

As a note, mailman also uses mbox files. We could try its archive
generation capability. I am not suggesting we move to mailman, just
that we use and existing tool that may work better to generate the
archives themselves.

Either way, this is certainly not urgent, although it is important.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 22:26:04 Re: Email not searchable in our archives
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-11 22:13:25 Re: [ADMIN] 8.2.4 patches? (fwd)